Welcome to the Checkmate Community Forums forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited
access to view most discussions, articles and access to our other FREE features.
By joining our free community you will be able to:
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support by clicking here or by using the"contact us" link at the bottom of the page.





Jeff , just curious what power are you going to be running Sterling ,Ilmor , Merc . or your local builder tom , and are you going to be hanging # 6's dry sumps off the back ? Jeff not to be rude but .................... having the mold to do this build does not necessarily mean you are going to have the same wave crushing boat that was built to a different set of standards or should i say..... like a Brick ***** house considering Checkmate is a production boat and totaty out of there leaque when it comes to building a boat of this quality , and the reason behind my thinking is .......... there layup in the past was much to be desired which often looked like a 10 year old did the layup using chop and woven roving for just about everything with wood not fully encapsulated along with weep holes not properly sealed , ect , ect . Jeff , i guess the bottom line is .... unless Checkmate has went to a different lay up schedule during this time or ( build ) i would have a few major concerns involving this matter just on that fact alone because we both know that Lake Mich can , and will kick your azzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz . Just my 2 cents .![]()
Hey guys i apologize to everyone on this thread if you feel that i an trying to bash Checkmate Boat Co because that is not my intention considering over the last few years i seem to have done more structural repairs on Check's from stringers , transom's , floors , ect ,ect , then any other one brand or make of boat due to the lack of craftsmanship in the past , and to tell you the truth i for one am glad to hear that they have stepped up the quality of there build . Hey guy's , once again i apologize if i have offended anyone because i meant no harm ,and Jeff ........i cant wait to see the new Wave crusher or hear it out on the big lake .
I find this repair statement hard to believe....but if you say so.
I have not seen or heard of any manufacturing process or materials changes recently or not so recenlty for that matter.....and my last 6 checkamtes were a 2000, 2001, 2007, 2008, 2010 and 2012.
-Craig


This will not be a dissapointment and will put a lot of people in check.









.... considering Checkmate is a production boat and totaty out of there leaque when it comes to building a boat of this quality , and the reason behind my thinking is .......... there layup in the past was much to be desired which often looked like a 10 year old did the layup using chop and woven roving for just about everything with wood not fully encapsulated along with weep holes not properly sealed , ect , ect .
You don't keep 'em long enought to get out of warranty, never mind fall apart!
LOL

Graig , just a quick mention everything ......that i have worked on lately is prior to the year 2000 ,and non the less regardless of what you think Checks are a production made boat .Craig , i am not going to get into a pissing match about chop or Matt like you mentioned in post # 87 ,and if that is the case what fabric did they use for there skin coat WOVEN ROVING .......................Graig , just a quick mention everything ......that i have worked on lately is prior to the year 2000 ,and non the less regardless of what you think Checks are a production made boat .
. This is why many older Checkmates get rebuilt. Unlike Hydrostreams where the core is the main culprit, Checkmates failures lie in the structure under the floor. I understand the desire to keep the costs of boat building down..especially during a bad economy..but if Checkmate switched to high density PVC coring materials (Mantex, Coosa Board, Airex PXC, etc.) for their stringers, transoms, bulkheads, etc. none of their boats would require rebuilding today. Glassing the topdeck and hull around the entire perimeter would also help the structural integrity of the final product along with vacuum bagging during the layup. All these suggestions are time consuming and costly that would have to be passed to the consumer. As far as this 40'?? Checkmate that is being built......I'm sure Checkmate is going the xtra measure to make this boat outstanding in every way. If they're going to enter the "high end custom" offshore world they will have to compete with the likes of Hustler, Outerlimits, Active Thunder, Eliminator, DCB, Skater, Spectra, Sonic, etc. Unless they've built an entire new mold...the only new 40+' mold I know of in the last 10 years came out of the defunct lawsuit "Apache" out of Delray Beach. Alot of talent went into retooling and straightening out the old 41' Apache mold including Steve Koss, Steve Wilson, Bob Sacente, etc. After they lost the lawsuit to McManus, I'm not sure where that 41' mold went??? But it was bad azz and would've built an incredible boat
!!! Sacente had a 41' mold with xtremely turned down outer chines that were built as "Chiefs"...only a few were made...including one 37' Chief based on the Active Thunder 37' AVH mold.....which brings me back to reality....what 40'